2017 Annual UDOT Conference

The 2017 Annual Conference occurred from November 7 – 9, 2017 at the South Towne Exposition Center in Sandy, Utah.  More than 1,800 attendees were expected to attend.  Throughout the three days, there was networking opportunities, keynote speakers, and numerous breakout sessions focusing on our diverse and extensive industry expertise, building capacity and honing skills. Below are the results of the 2016 and 2017 comparisons.


Survey Respondents

Conference attendees were from various sources. Below is a chart indicating who responded to the survey in 2017.



Overall Quality of the Conference and Conference Committee

Conference attendees were asked a variety of questions about the conference overall, as well as specific questions related to the conference committee and the registration process.
Overall Quality of the Conference
Respondents were asked to rate the overall quality of the conference (On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)), below are there responses.
"Informative" Conference Committee
Rate the conference committee on being informative.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
"Courteous" Conference Committee
Rate the conference committee on being courteous.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
"Helpful" Conference Committee
Rate the conference committee on being helpful.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
Registration Process
How would you rate the ease of the registration process?
On a scale from 1 (very confusing) to 5 (extremely easy)
Social Attendance
Did you attend the social hour on Tuesday, November 7th 2017?


General Sessions

There were a few questions about the general sessions, as well as the specific ratings for the keynote speakers.
Content and Quality of the General Sessions

Respondents were asked to rate the content and quality of the general session on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great).

Carlos Braceras
Rate each specific speakers presentation. (Carlos Braceras)
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
Shane Marshall
Rate each specific speakers presentation. (Shane Marshall)
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)


Breakout Sessions

The conference attendees were asked a variety of questions regarding the content and quality of the breakout sessions. The attendees were also asked about the qualities of the facilities for the breakout sessions.
Content and Quality of the Breakout Sessions

Respondents were asked to rate the content and quality of the breakout sessions on a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great).

"Comfortable" Breakout Sessions Facilities
Rate the breakout session facilities for comfort.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
"Visibility" in Breakout Sessions Facilities
Rate the breakout session facilities for visibility.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)
"Sound" in Breakout Sessions Facilities
Rate the breakout session facilities for sound.
On a scale from 1 (poor) to 5 (great)


Exhibitors

There were many exhibitors in attendance and they were asked specific questions about their experience.
Adequate Time and Opportunity to Grow Customer Base?
Rate the conference for the ability grow a customer base.
1 (Absolutely not) to 5 ( Couldn't have gone better)
Pricing Structure for Booth Space and Registration Fair?
Rate the conference for pricing structure of the booth space and registration.
1 (Not fair at all) to 5 (Very fair, great value)


Raw Data and Data Lens

Click on either of the below for a more in-depth look at the data. It can be exported in various formats, or the data lens can be used to explore the data quickly to answer immediate questions.